Leverage your facility's data to enhance maintenance, operations, and reporting.

Asset Inventory
Repository for all fixed equipment in the facility including main mechanical properties, damage mechanisms, and file management.
Inspection Work Planning
Time or risk-based approaches for setting inspection schedules. Non-conformance reporting and CMMS linkage for automation of work order creation.
API 581 Risk Analysis
Run calculations based on API 581 quantitative risk analysis. Forecast risk into the future to align risk profiles and thresholds with inspection schedules.
Reporting
Generate reports from any module of the software. Manipulate externally in Microsoft Excel to create tailored reports.
Structure
Setup your Plant > Unit > System structure for your facility or facilities.
NDE
Corrosion monitoring for short term, long term, and remaining life calculations.

Drill Into The Details

Empower your personnel with comprehensive details and insights for simplified asset tracking, improved maintenance efficiency, and precise lifespan calculations.

TMIN Calculations

Design Minimum Thickness calculations and material stresses included for API 650/653, ASME Section VIII Div 1, B31.1, B31.3, B31.4, and B31.8 standards.

Additional Properties

Go beyond the data fields in MI Suite. If you track additional information for your fixed equipment, create additional fields to capture, report, and visualize this data.

File Attachments

Quickly attach files, documents, photos, and other relevant data to the inspection record and optimize maintenance operations with enhanced data quality.

Non-Conformances

Identify, generate, rank, and monitor non-conformances through closure. Repair work orders are created automatically in the CMMS system.

Ensure a PSM compliant program with either time-based or risk-based approach.

PSM Compliance

Track PSM compliance metrics to ensure adherence to regulatory requirements.

Asset Files

Upload U1's, manufacturing drawings, and inspection files directly to asset records.

Risk-Based Inspection

Quantify risk with API 581 calculations to optimize your program.

Inspection Strategies

Configure your company-specific inspection protocols for consistency and optimization.

Corrosion Monitoring

Capture thickness readings at consistent locations for corrosion calculations.

Non-Conformances

Rank non-conformances to automate work order generation in SAP, Maximo, and any other CMMS.

Enterprise Asset Management Solutions
The Mechanical Integrity Suite is a purpose-built tool that provides enterprise-level oversight of asset inspection, maintenance, and compliance metrics. Regardless of facility size or complexity, have a clear understanding of where your program stands.

Our API 581 quantitative risk engine is built directly into the MI Suite and adds a layer of validation for improved decision making. Quickly and confidently analyze consequence areas for preventive maintenance and inspection planning optimization. API 581 Risk Engine features include:
Built-in quantitative risk engine + damage factors based on API 581.
Probability of failure calculations derived from API 581 standards.
Component susceptibility analysis based on asset properties.
Asset failure forecasting enables risk-based inspection scheduling.
Select a balanced/unbalanced risk matrix to best support your API 581 implementation.

Inspection Data Management Systems (IDMS) Enable High-Fidelity Data Capture.

Inspection data from field technicians is uploaded via the customized data entry forms to calculate corrosion rates and remaining lives of asset components. Preventive maintenance strategies can then be planned for based on findings.

Inspection Work Planning
Focus on high-risk components to improve resource allocation/decision-making for field technicians and asset managers.
Automate Work Orders
Work orders are derived from the tasks outlined in the Inspection Work Plans. This helps keep track of the activities completed with oversight from management with task completion approvals.
Work & Component History
Component history includes critical information such as inspection date, conditions, observations, thickness readings and more.
CML Properties
For each CML, the properties can be specified, along with positional descriptions for each thickness measurement location for the CML.
Historical Readings
Customized reports for historical readings. Our template designs have been so strong that clients often demand that we replicate it for their deployments.
FAQ

Fast Answers for 
Fast-Moving Teams

We’ve worked with dozens of fast-moving teams—so we know what comes up before your first call. Here’s what you should know.
How does VisualAIM help in defining the scope and assessing data quality for an MI program?

VisualAIM assists in these crucial initial steps:

Defining Scope: To estimate resource requirements, VisualAIM helps understand the total number of in-scope assets. We typically start with the facility's Asset Register or Master Equipment List (MEL). If this data is unavailable or of low quality, they leverage their Intelligent P&ID capabilities to automate the extraction of the MEL faster and more accurately from legacy P&IDs. We often recommend focusing on key assets like Pressure Vessels, Heat Exchangers, and Storage Tanks initially.

We help categorize existing data into three tiers:

- Tier 1 (Best): Data residing in databases, third-party software, or coherent spreadsheets (1-2 hours/asset for collection).
- Tier 2 (Better): Electronic files like PDFs, Word documents, images, and AutoCAD files (3-5 hours/asset for collection).
- Tier 3 (Good): Illegible scans and physical paper copies (8-10 hours/asset for collection). VisualAIM uses programmatic approaches to process disorganized electronic files and even assists with scanning physical documents, streamlining the data collection and migration process while identifying and addressing inconsistencies.

What are the primary reasons for implementing a Mechanical Integrity (MI) program?

The implementation of a Mechanical Integrity (MI) program is driven by three primary and interconnected reasons, often summarized as "the why": safety, compliance, and value (ROI).

Safety: The foremost reason is to ensure the safety of personnel by preventing incidents like loss of containment that could lead to injury or damage. A robust MI program helps confirm that assets are in sufficient condition to operate safely, ultimately aiming to build a safer operation and reduce incidents.
Compliance: Closely tied to safety, compliance involves adhering to regulatory standards, such as those from OSHA, EPA, and API, particularly in the U.S. process industry. An MI program, especially when supported by software, enables facilities to demonstrate compliance to auditors, avoid liabilities from non-compliance, and track key Process Safety Management (PSM) metrics.

Value (ROI) and Efficiency: This driver focuses on the financial justification. MI programs create value by preventing negative outcomes and increasing efficiencies. This includes preventing unplanned downtime, extending equipment lifespan, shifting from reactive to proactive maintenance, enabling faster data recall for maintenance personnel, and improving overall decision-making due to centralized and higher-quality data.

For multi-facility organizations, an enterprise-wide MI platform further enhances value through improved data visibility and data-driven decisions across sites, leading to benefits like benchmarking and optimized budget allocation.

What is the recommended phased approach for enterprise-wide MI software implementation, and what are the benefits of this approach?

A phased approach is typically recommended for enterprise-wide MI software implementation, especially for dozens of facilities. This approach usually involves three phases:

-Phase 1 (Quick Win): Minimal data load (primarily the Master Equipment List) to provide early visibility and exposure to the software for site personnel

-Phase 2 (Bulk of Work): Gathering and extracting all requisite data points, associating electronic files with assets, making the program fully operational for users.

-Phase 3 (Ultrasonic Thickness Data): Focusing on Condition Monitoring Locations (CML) and associated thickness measurements. This is left for last to avoid delaying the program's operational status, with a focus on normalizing CML placement and naming conventions.

This phased approach provides quick wins, allows for refinement of processes, and ensures that users become familiar with the system progressively, leading to better adoption.

What are the tangible benefits and returns of implementing the Mechanical Integrity Suite?

The primary benefits of implementing the software are centered around significant gains in operational efficiency, enhanced data management, and improved compliance and risk mitigation.

Drastic Efficiency Gains: The software can lead to a substantial reduction in the labor required for asset management. A testimonial from a Plant Manager at Air Liquide noted that after implementation, their asset management team was reduced from fifteen people to just two, demonstrating the software's powerful impact on productivity. Another user praised it as a "time saver" that "really reduces the man-hours for Asset Management Records".

Centralized and High-Quality Data: By serving as a central repository for all fixed equipment information—including mechanical properties, drawings, U1 forms, and inspection files—the software provides a single source of truth and the "highest level of data clarity and organization for your assets".

Automated and Streamlined Workflows: The suite automates key processes to reduce manual effort and ensure follow-through. It can identify, rank, and monitor non-conformances through to closure, and it can be linked to a CMMS system (like SAP or Maximo) to automatically generate work orders for repairs.

Enhanced Compliance and Safety: The software is built to ensure a PSM-compliant program. By capturing a detailed history for every component—including inspection dates, thickness readings, and non-conformances—it enables better preventive maintenance planning and a clearer view of an asset's health over time.

Weekly Deep Dive
Close
MI Deep Dive: 
Episode 6 Available Now